Why should banks care about ISO20022?

 Consider some of this data:

-Total transition costs for migration to ISO 20022 payment message standard cost the SEPA $9 billion as per a 2017 study.

-Payments Canada expects a migration from checks will save the Canadian economy $4.5 billion.

This is good for the economy and society as a whole but I am a bank running for profit so why should I care? I have a system that works fine, the inefficiencies and delays in my current system is to my benefit as I can enjoy the float and charge more plus its been working fine for decades.

Well too bad, bank. Customers and regulators are insisting on this change and if you don't change you risk rising operational costs. falling behind the curve leading to loss of customers and regulatory burdens.

Lets peel this onion, shall we?

Rising operational costs: Drop in STP rates means less and less of your transactions will be completed without manual intervention. As it is, only about 60-80 % of your transactions go through STP and this is already  impacting the cost vectors of your payment business. ISO20022 rich data messaging allows you to do better reconciliation leading to improved STP rates.

Regulatory burdens: Sanctions screening, AML, KYC, purpose of making the transaction, legal entity, ultimate beneficiary  all these are checks you are doing today. With tools like LEI in ISO20022 this information travels with the message reducing your regulatory obligations.

Loss of customer: If I am a customer expecting a wire transfer and its going to take a week to get the money in my bank account and cost me $40 for this  , I will certainly look for options to get the funds faster and for lesser cost. No brainer here.

So the cost of not moving to ISO20022 is not the factor .Rather, it is the when and what deadlines I am facing that drive this decision. See this chart and note that many market players in North America are yet to go live but be assured all regulators are working in this directions.